![]() | AllAboutMormons.com Webmaster from La Jolla, California: |
I too must confess that I don't know the official church policy on this matter, but, based on what I do know about how the Church functions, I would be very surprised if a worthy man who had repented of past mistakes could not serve as a bishop.![]() | There's a far better way to learn about Mormons! If you have questions, consider inviting Mormons that live in your area to visit with you in your home! |
When a person is undergoing disciplinary action, it is noted on his/her membership record. Following the successful completion of disciplinary action, the church reissues the person's membership record with the notes removed. If a person is ex-communicated, they must go through a period of at least one year of repentance before they can be rebaptized, and for men (not sure the timeline for women) another year of good behaviour and a successful application to the First Presidency before full priesthood blessings can be restored. During this time, the notes are changed to read something like "Restoration of blessings required", particularly if the person was endowed prior to the excommunication. Once the First Presidency has approved the restoration of priesthood blessings, another new membership record is issued, which contains no mention of the disciplinary action. Presumably, this would mean that the person is now eligible to hold any calling, having fulfilled the requirements of the repentance period and shown that they have truly repented.
This is a very good question and I don't think that through the internet the answer it so be found. I feel that this question is best taken to a bishop or if you don't receive the answer you feel you should go to a member of your stake presidency.